GlobalGAP, HACCP and ISO 22000: A Produce Buyer's Guide
Certificates get demanded, attached to emails and never read. Here is what each scheme actually covers, which ones apply to fresh produce, and how to check any of them in minutes.

Somewhere in almost every first conversation between an importer and an Indian produce exporter, the buyer asks for certifications and the supplier attaches whatever they have. The certificates arrive as PDF files, get filed, and are rarely read. This is a mistake in both directions: buyers routinely demand schemes that do not apply to the product they are buying, and routinely accept certificates that do not cover the entity they are buying from.
This guide explains what the major schemes actually certify, which ones are relevant to fresh fruit and vegetables as opposed to processed food, how the Indian regulatory layer fits alongside the international schemes, and how to verify any certificate you are sent in a few minutes. It is written for buyers, not auditors, and it favours the questions that change a purchasing decision over the ones that fill a checklist.
Four different things get called "certification"
The single most useful idea in this subject is that the word certification covers four different objects, and a certificate only means something for the object it attaches to. A farm can be certified, a facility can be certified, a management system can be certified, and an individual shipment can be tested and certified. Confusion between these four is where most misplaced trust comes from.
| Level | What is certified | Typical schemes | The question it answers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farm | Growing practice on specific registered plots | GlobalG.A.P., organic schemes | Was this grown responsibly and safely? |
| Facility | A packhouse or processing site and its hygiene | HACCP, BRCGS, FSSC 22000, APEDA recognition | Was it handled and packed safely? |
| Management system | The organisation's food safety system as a whole | ISO 22000 | Does the company manage food safety systematically? |
| Shipment | One consignment, by inspection or lab test | Phytosanitary certificate, residue reports, quality inspection | Is this specific container compliant? |
Notice that only the last row travels with your goods. Everything above it certifies capability and practice in general, which matters, but a supplier with an impressive certificate wall can still load you a poor container, and a modest supplier with disciplined shipment-level testing can serve you flawlessly for years. Keep the four levels separate in your head and the rest of this guide is straightforward.
GlobalG.A.P.: the farm-level standard
GlobalG.A.P. (the initials stand for Good Agricultural Practice) is the dominant international certification for how fresh produce is grown. It covers the farm: water use, pesticide application and storage, worker hygiene and safety, harvest practice, traceability back to the plot. For fruit and vegetables the relevant certificate is the Integrated Farm Assurance standard, and European retail programmes in particular treat it as an entry requirement rather than a distinction.
The detail buyers most often miss is that GlobalG.A.P. certifies producers, not traders. The certificate belongs to the farm or grower group, identified by a thirteen-digit number called a GGN. An exporter who is not the grower cannot be GlobalG.A.P. certified for production; what they can hold is a separate Chain of Custody certificate, which attests that certified and non-certified product are kept segregated as goods move through the supply chain. If a trading company sends you a farm certificate, the right follow-up is simple: whose farms, which plots, and does your chain of custody cover my order?

Verification is genuinely easy and almost nobody does it. GlobalG.A.P. operates a public validation database in which any GGN or Chain of Custody number can be checked without a login, showing whether the certificate is valid, for which products, and until when. A certificate that cannot be found there, or that covers mangoes when you are buying pomegranates, has told you what you need to know. Checking takes less time than reading the PDF.
HACCP: the discipline everything else is built on
HACCP (Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points) is not really a certificate at all in origin: it is a method, codified internationally under Codex Alimentarius, for identifying where in a process a food hazard can occur and controlling it at that point. In a packhouse handling fresh produce, the critical points are things like wash-water sanitation, cold-room temperatures, foreign-body controls and glass policies. Certification against HACCP means an auditor has verified that the facility has such a plan and follows it.
For a produce buyer, HACCP matters at the facility level: the packhouse where your onions are graded and bagged, or where pomegranates are sorted and boxed. It says nothing about the farm and nothing about the trading company's office. When a supplier offers a HACCP certificate, the two useful questions are which facility it covers and whether that is the facility your goods will actually pass through. A certificate for a processing plant in another state, held by a sister company, is decoration.
It is also worth knowing that HACCP certification on its own is the entry tier. The larger retail-facing schemes below all contain HACCP within them, plus a management system and stricter site requirements around it. For wholesale fresh produce moving to the Gulf or Asia, facility-level HACCP is often a perfectly reasonable expectation. For European retail programmes it is usually the floor rather than the requirement.
ISO 22000 and FSSC 22000: the management-system layer
ISO 22000 is the international standard for a food safety management system. Where HACCP looks at a process and GlobalG.A.P. looks at a farm, ISO 22000 looks at an organisation: how it plans, documents, communicates, handles incidents and improves. It incorporates HACCP principles inside a broader management framework, and it is the scheme most likely to be held by a larger exporter with its own facilities and staff functions.
The nuance a buyer should know is the relationship with FSSC 22000. Retail and manufacturing buyers increasingly ask for schemes recognised by GFSI, the Global Food Safety Initiative, and ISO 22000 alone did not achieve that recognition because its prerequisite-programme content was considered too loose. FSSC 22000 is essentially ISO 22000 plus tightened prerequisite requirements, and that combined scheme is GFSI-recognised. If your downstream customer specifies GFSI, plain ISO 22000 will not satisfy them; FSSC 22000 or one of the retailer schemes will.
For most fresh-produce buying at wholesale, ISO 22000 is a positive signal about organisational maturity rather than a hard requirement. Treat it as evidence that the company is likely to handle a claim, a recall query or a documentation problem in an orderly way, which over a multi-year programme is worth real money.
BRCGS and the retailer schemes
BRCGS (originally the British Retail Consortium standard), IFS in continental Europe and SQF in North America are the retailer-driven schemes, all GFSI-recognised, all substantially stricter and more prescriptive than the standards above. They exist because supermarket chains wanted a single demanding audit they could rely on instead of auditing every supplier themselves. Certification is site-specific, graded, and expensive to hold.
You will encounter these mostly when your end customer is retail. A packhouse holding BRCGS is a strong signal, and in the Indian fresh-produce sector still a comparatively rare one, concentrated among the larger export houses serving European programmes. If you are buying for wholesale markets, demanding BRCGS mostly filters out capable suppliers for no benefit; if you are supplying a European retailer, their specification will name the scheme for you, and the conversation with your Indian supplier should start from that document.
The Indian layer: APEDA, packhouse recognition and FSSAI
Alongside the international schemes sits India's own regulatory framework, and buyers who understand it can read a supplier much faster. APEDA, the Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority, registers exporters of scheduled agricultural products; the registration itself (an RCMC) establishes that the entity is a recognised agricultural exporter, and for certain products APEDA also operates recognition schemes for packhouses that meet export handling standards.
Packhouse recognition is the piece worth probing, because for some product-and-market combinations, notably grapes and certain fresh produce lines to the EU, routing through an APEDA-recognised packhouse is effectively mandatory, with plot registration, pre-harvest inspection and residue sampling built into the system. A supplier who can tell you which recognised packhouse will handle your order, and show its recognition, is describing a real supply chain. One who waves at the subject is describing an intention.
- APEDA RCMC: the exporter is registered for scheduled agricultural exports. Ask for the number and check it is current.
- APEDA-recognised packhouse: the handling facility meets export standards; for some EU-bound products this is required, not optional.
- FSSAI licence: India's domestic food regulator; a basic legitimacy check for any food business operating in India.
- Phytosanitary certificate: issued per shipment by the Plant Quarantine authority, certifying freedom from pests. This is a shipment document, not a company credential.
- Agmark grading: an Indian quality-grading mark used for some commodities; relevant where your contract references Indian grade standards.

Why residue testing beats every logo for fresh produce
Here is the uncomfortable truth about all of the above: none of it guarantees that the container you receive complies with the pesticide residue limits of your market. Certification schemes audit practice periodically; residues are a property of a specific lot, driven by what was sprayed on that crop in that season and when. The regulatory limits, called MRLs (maximum residue limits), are set by your destination, and the EU's are among the strictest in the world and are revised continually.
For exactly this reason, serious fresh-produce programmes are built on shipment-level residue testing at accredited laboratories, either pre-shipment at origin or on arrival, and often both during the early life of a relationship. A supplier who agrees readily to pre-shipment testing against your market's MRL list, at a named accredited lab, is offering you something more valuable than any framed certificate: evidence about your actual goods.
The practical sequence for a buyer is short. Identify your market's MRL regime (for the EU there is a public pesticide database; other markets publish their own lists or follow Codex). Give your supplier the list that applies. Agree the lab, the sampling method and who pays. Make the report a shipping document for the first several consignments, and relax the frequency only as the track record builds.

A word on organic
Organic is its own regulatory world and does not blend into the schemes above. Indian organic exports operate under the NPOP (National Programme for Organic Production), and acceptance of that certification varies by destination; the EU, for instance, has moved to requiring certification under its own organic regulation for imports, with certifiers accredited for the purpose. If you are buying organic, the certificate must name the scheme your market accepts, cover the specific product, and trace to the certified operation.
Treat any gap between the organic claim and the paperwork as disqualifying rather than negotiable. Food-safety certificates and organic certificates are not interchangeable, and a supplier who offers a HACCP certificate in response to an organic question has answered a different question.
What to actually require, by market
| Your market | Reasonable to require | Usually unnecessary |
|---|---|---|
| EU retail programmes | GlobalG.A.P. with GGN check, recognised packhouse, MRL testing per shipment, often BRCGS or IFS at the packer | Little; this is the strictest lane |
| EU wholesale | GlobalG.A.P. increasingly expected, MRL testing, phytosanitary compliance | BRCGS, unless your buyers ask |
| Gulf and Middle East | Facility HACCP, phytosanitary certificate, agreed spec and inspection; residue testing on request | GlobalG.A.P., BRCGS |
| South and Southeast Asia | Phytosanitary certificate, agreed specification, third-party inspection at loading | Management-system schemes |
| Processing and ingredients | Facility HACCP or FSSC 22000, lab testing to your input spec (moisture, colour, aflatoxin) | Farm-level schemes, usually |
The pattern in the table is deliberate: requirements should climb with the regulatory strictness of the destination and the sensitivity of the end use, not with anxiety. Demanding the full European stack for a wholesale consignment to a Gulf market does not make the shipment safer; it narrows your supplier pool to the largest houses and raises your price for certificates that nothing in your channel will ever ask to see.
Verifying any certificate in five minutes
- Read the certified entity's name and address, and check it is the party on your proforma invoice. A certificate held by a sister company or a facility you will not use is not your certificate.
- Check the scope line: the products and processes covered. Certificates are scoped, and fresh pomegranate is not covered by a scope that says processed spices.
- Check the expiry date and the issuing certification body. Schemes are delivered through accredited certifiers whose names can be searched in seconds.
- Verify online where the scheme allows it: GlobalG.A.P. numbers in the public database, and other schemes via the certifier's own verification pages.
- Cross-check the story: a supplier claiming a certified packhouse should be able to name it, place it, and explain which of your products pass through it. Inconsistency here outweighs any document.
None of this requires expertise, travel or cost, and doing it visibly changes the conversation with a supplier. The exporters worth working with are quietly pleased when a buyer checks, because verification is the only thing that protects the value of certificates they paid real money to earn. We hold our own registrations to the same standard and share them, with numbers, at the enquiry stage; any supplier serving export markets should expect to do the same.
Sources & further reading
- GLOBALG.A.P. certificate validation database · public search for any GGN or Chain of Custody number, no login required
- GLOBALG.A.P. Chain of Custody standard · how certified product is kept segregated beyond the farm
- Codex Alimentarius (FAO/WHO) · the international food code in which HACCP principles are defined
- ISO 22000 food safety management · the management-system standard, from the issuing body
- GFSI (Global Food Safety Initiative) · the benchmarking body that recognises BRCGS, IFS, SQF and FSSC 22000
- BRCGS · the retailer-driven site certification scheme
- APEDA · Indian agricultural export authority: exporter registration and packhouse recognition
- EU pesticides database · the public source for EU maximum residue limits
Sourcing from India?
Products covered in this guide
Grades, packing specifications and container capacities for each, or send us your destination port and quantity for a quotation.
More guides
How to Verify an Indian Produce Exporter Before You Order
Anyone can build a website and claim to export. Here is what actually distinguishes a working exporter from a broker with a domain name, and how to check it before money moves.
ShippingIncoterms for Fresh Produce: Who Pays When Cold Chain Fails
The Incoterm decides who pays for the reefer and who carries the loss if the temperature slips. Most fresh-produce buyers discover which, only after a container arrives warm.
